Let $ V $ be a linear space over the real number field $ \mathbb{R} $. An inner product is a real-valued function $ (\cdot, \cdot): V \times V\rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ if it satisfies the following conditions:
The linear space $ V $ becomes an Euclidean space $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)\right) $ when endowed with an inner product $ (\cdot, \cdot) $. Note that for the same linear space, the inner product is not necessarily unique.
The norm or length $ \|\alpha\| $ of $ \alpha \in V $ is defined by $ \|\alpha\|^2=(\alpha, \alpha) $. If $ \alpha, \beta \in V $ satisfies $ (\alpha, \beta)=0 $, they are called orthogonal elements. If a family of elements $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ in $ V $ satisfies
they are called an orthonormal family. In particular, if $ k=\text{dim}\;V $, they constitute an orthonormal basis of $ V $.
As a generalization of the basic fact the hypotenuse of a triangle is greater than the right angled side, there is the famous Bessel inequality [1] [2] in a general Euclidean space, which states: suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of the Eucliean space $ V $, then for any $ \alpha \in V $ we have
Furthermore, if $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_k $ (not necessarily orthonormal) and $ \alpha $ are arbitrary elements of the Eucliean space $ V $, then the famous Selberg inequality [3] indicates that
These inequalities have many important applications in mathematics. On can easily find that if $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_k $ are an orthonormal family, the Selberg inequality degenerates into the Bessel inequality since $ \sum_{j=1}^{k}|(\varphi_i, \varphi_j)|=\sum_{j=1}^k\delta_{ij}=1 $ for any fixed $ 1 \leq i \leq k $.
In this paper, we would like to strengthen the Selberg inequality and the Bessel inquality by combining the two famous inequalities. It appears that it is the first time to reveal the elegant relation between these two famous inequalities.
Theorem 1.1 Let $ V $ be an Euclidean space and $ (\cdot, \cdot)_1 $ and $ (\cdot, \cdot)_2 $ two inner products on $ V $, which satisfy the following metric property, i.e.
for any $ \alpha \in V $. Furthermore, suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)_2\right) $, and $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell} $ are arbitrary elements in $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)_1\right) $ satisfying
Then we have
Here $ L(\varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell}) $ and $ L(\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k) $ are linear spaces spanned by $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell} $ and $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ respectively.
When $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell} $ are an orthonormal family of $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)_1\right) $, Theorem 1.1 gives the result of Dragomir [4], which considers an elegant monotonicity property of Bessel's inequality.
Corollary 1.1 Let $ V $ be an Euclidean space and $ (\cdot, \cdot)_1 $ and $ (\cdot, \cdot)_2 $ two inner products on $ V $, which satisfy the following metric property $ \|\alpha\|_1 \geq \|\alpha\|_2 $ for any $ \alpha \in V $. Suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)_2\right) $, and $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell} $ are an orthonormal family of $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)_1\right) $ satisfying
For the same norm in the Euclidean space $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)\right) $, we still have similar results. As an example, we have
Corollary 1.2 Suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)\right) $, and $ \varphi_1, \varphi_2, \cdots, \varphi_{\ell} $ are arbitrary elements in $ \left(V; (\cdot, \cdot)\right) $ satisfying
Remark Even the case $ \ell=1 $ in Corollary 1.2 is not trivial. In fact, suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family. Then for any $ \alpha \in \mathbb{R} $, and $ \varphi \in L(\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k) $, we have
On the one hand, it formally implies the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality $ |(\alpha, \varphi)| \leq \|\alpha\|\|\varphi\| $ by virtue of Bessel's equality. On the other hand, in geometry it shows that the length of the projection of $ \alpha $ onto the subspace $ L(\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k) $ is larger than that of the projection of $ \alpha $ onto any element $ \varphi $ in this subspace.
Lemma 2.1 Let $ V $ be an Euclidean space endowed with an inner product $ (\cdot, \cdot) $. Suppose that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of $ (V; (\cdot, \cdot)) $. Then for any sequence $ \lambda_i \in \mathbb{R} $, $ i=1, 2, \cdots, k $ and any $ \alpha \in V $, we have that
Proof For completeness, we give a detailed proof from scratch. Let
Obviously, we have
In fact, let
Then $ u $ is the projection of $ \alpha $ onto $ W $, and then $ \alpha-u \perp W $. Hence (2.1) holds since
By the Pythagorean theorem, we have
Notice that
and that
We have
From (2.2) and (2.3), we establish this lemma.
Now we start to prove Theorem 1.1.
Proof For any sequence $ c_i \in \mathbb{R} $, $ i=1, 2, \cdots, \ell $, we consider
where we used that $ \varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, \cdots, \varepsilon_k $ are an orthonormal family of $ (V; (\cdot, \cdot)_2) $, and hence for any $ \varphi_i $, $ i=1, 2, \cdots, k $, we have
After switching the summations, we find that
By Lemma 2.1 with $ \lambda_j=\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}c_i(\varphi_i, \varepsilon_j)_2 $, we have
Now we consider the term
on the left-hand side of (2.4). By the definition of the norm, we observe that
Here we only use basic properties of inner product and the trivial inequality $ x \leq |x| $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{R} $. By the elementary inequality $ |c_i||c_j|\leq \frac{1}{2}\left(|c_i|^2+|c_j|^2\right) $, we further have
Take
We find that
From (2.4), (2.5), and (2.7), we complete the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Theorem 1.1 also holds true for the inner product space over the complex numbers $ \mathbb{C} $. The only difference is that in (2.6) we obtain
And eventually we also take