Let $ \Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n (n\ge2) $ be a bounded domain and $ 1\le q\le\frac{np}{n-p} $. The Sobolev embedding theorem tells us the embedding $ W^{1, p}_0(\Omega)\subset L^q(\Omega) $ is continuous when $ 1<p<n $ but $ W^{1, n}_0(\Omega)\nsubseteq L^{\infty}(\Omega) $. Trudinger [1] established in the borderline case that $ W^{1, n}_0(\Omega)\subset L_{\varphi_n}(\Omega) $, where $ L_{\varphi_n}(\Omega) $ is the Orlicz space associated with the Young function $ \varphi_n(t)=\exp(\beta|t|^{\frac{n}{n-1}})-1 $ for some $ \beta>0 $. In the celebrated paper[2], Moser found the optimal $ \beta $. In fact, he proved that it holds
where $ \Omega $ be a domain with finite measure in Euclidean n-space $ \mathbb{R}^n $, $ \beta_{n}=n\left( \frac{n\pi^{\frac{n}{2}}}{\Gamma(\frac{n}{2}+1)}\right) ^{\frac{1}{n-1}} $ and $ u\in W^{1, n}_0(\Omega) $ with $ \int_{\Omega}|\nabla u|^ndx\le1 $. Furthermore, this constant $ \beta_n $ is sharp. Similar exponential inequalities on bounded domain have been considered firstly by A. Alvino, V. Ferone and G. Trombetti [3] in Lorentz-Sobolev spaces of $ \mathbb{R}^{n} $.
There has also been substantial progress for Moser-Trudinger inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. In the case of compact Riemannian manifolds, the study of Trudinger-Moser inequalities can be traced back to Aubin [4], Cherrier [5, 6], and Fontana [7]. In the case of Cartan-Hadamard manifold Kong et al [8] and Bertrand et al [9] established the sharp Trudinger-Moser inequality.
One of the aim of this paper is to establish Trudinger-Moser type inequalities on $ M $ for Lorentz-Sobolev spaces. For simplicity, we also denote by $ L^{n, q}(\Omega) $ the Lorentz-Sobolev space on domain $ \Omega\subset M $. One of the main results is the following:
Theorem 1.1 Let $ \Omega $ be a bounded domain of $ M $, $ n\geq2 $, and let $ u\in C^{\infty}_{0}(\Omega) $ be such that
(1) If $ 1<q<\infty $ and $ Ric_{g}\geq -(n-1)b^{2} $ for some $ b>0 $, then there exists a constant $ C=C(n, q) $ such that
Furthermore, this inequality is sharp in the sense that if $ \beta_{q} $ is replaced by any $ \beta>\beta_{q} $, then inequality (1.1) can no longer hold with some $ C $ independent of $ u $.
(2) If $ q=\infty $, then for every $ \beta<\beta_{\infty} $, there exists a constant $ C=C(n, q, \beta) $ such that
Furthermore, this inequality is sharp in the sense that if $ \beta $ is replaced by any $ \beta\geq\beta_{\infty} $, then inequality (1.2) can no longer hold with some $ C $ independent of $ u $.
We begin by quoting some preliminary facts which will be needed in the sequel and refer to [8, 13] for more precise information about this subject.
Let $ M $ be an $ n $-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold with Riemannian metric $ ds^{2} $. If $ \{x^{i}\}_{1\leq i\leq n} $ is a local coordinate system, then we can write $ ds^{2}=\sum g_{ij}dx^{i}dx^{j} $ so that the Laplace-Beltrami operator $ \Delta_{M} $ in this local coordinate system is
where $ g=\det(g_{ij}) $ and $ (g^{ij})=(g_{ij})^{-1} $. We denote by $ \nabla_{M} $ the corresponding gradient.
From now on, we let $ M $ be a Cartan-Hadamard manifold. That is, $ M $ is a complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with negative curvature. Let $ p\in M $ and denote by $ \rho_{p}(x)= \rm{dist}(x, p) $ for all $ x\in M $, where $ \rm{dist}(\cdot, \cdot) $ denotes the geodesic distance. For simplicity, we denote by $ \rho(x)=\rho_{p}(x) $. Then $ \rho(x) $ is smooth on $ M\setminus\{p\} $ and it satisfies
For any $ \delta>0 $, denote by $ B_{\delta}(p)=\{x\in M: \rho(x)<\delta\} $ the geodesic ball in $ M $. We introduce the density function $ J_{p}(\theta, t) $ of the volume form in normal coordinates as follows (see e.g. [10], page 166-167). Choose an orthonormal basis $ \{\theta, e_{2}, \cdots, e_{n}\} $ on $ T_{p}M $ and let $ c(t)= \rm{Exp}_{p}t\theta $ be a geodesic. $ \{Y_{i}(t)\}_{2\leq i\leq n} $ are Jacobi fields satisfying the initial conditions
so that the density function can be given by
We note that $ J_{p}(t, \theta) $ does not depend on $ \{e_{2}, \cdots, e_{n}\} $ and $ J_{p}(t, \theta)\in C^{\infty}(T_{p}M\backslash\{p\}) $ by the definition of $ J_{p}(t, \theta) $. Furthermore, if we set $ J_{p}(\theta, 0)\equiv1 $, then $ J_{p}(t, \theta)\in C(T_{p}M) $ and
since $ Y_{i}(t) $ has the asymptotic expansion (see e.g. [10], page 169)
where $ R(\cdot, \cdot) $ is the curvature tensor on $ M $. By the definition of $ J_{p}(t, \theta) $, we have the following formula in polar coordinates on $ M $:
where $ d\sigma $ denotes the canonical measure of the unit sphere of $ T_{p}(M) $. Finally, we recall a useful fact of $ J_{p}(t, \theta) $ which plays an important role in the study of Moser-Trudinger inequalities. If the sectional curvature $ K $ on $ M $ satisfies $ K\leq -b $, then (see [10], page 172, line -2, the proof of Bishop-Gunther comparison theorem)
In particular, since $ M $ is with negative curvature, we have
which means $ J_{p}(t, \theta) $, as a function of $ t $ on $ [0, +\infty) $, is monotonically increasing.
We firstly recall the rearrangement of functions on $ M $. Suppose $ f $ is a nonnegative function on $ M $. The non-increasing rearrangement of $ f $ is defined by
where $ \lambda_{f}(s)=|\{x\in M: f(x)>s\}| $. Here we use the notation $ |\Sigma| $ for the measure of a measurable set $ \Sigma\subset M $. Set
Denote by$ L^{p, q}(\Omega) $ the Lorentz space of those function $ f $ on a domain $ \Omega\subset M $ satisfying
is finite.Similarly, denote by
We remark that for $ 1<q<+\infty $ and $ 0< r\leq +\infty $, there holds (see [11], Theorem 3.4)
where $ C(p, q) $ is a constant depending on $ p $ and $ r $. Moreover, we have the following generalization of Young's inequality for convolution (see [12]):
Proposition 3.1 Let $ 1<r, p_{1}, p_{2}<+\infty $ and $ 1\leq s, q_{1}, q_{2}\leq\infty $. If
then there exists $ C>0 $ such that
We also need the following inequality (see [12], Corollary 1.8)
Lemma 3.2 Let $ 0<\alpha<n $ and set $ \phi_{\alpha}=\frac{1}{\rho^{n-\alpha}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)} $. Then
where $ \omega_{n}=\pi^{n/2}/\Gamma(1+n/2) $ is the volume of $ \mathbb{S}^{n} $.
Proof As in the proof of [8], Lemma 3.2, we set, for any $ s>0 $,
We denote by $ \rho_{\theta}(s) $ the solution of $ \rho^{n-\alpha}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)=s^{-1} $. Then $ \rho_{\theta}(s)^{n-\alpha}J_{p}(\rho_{\theta}(s), \theta)=s^{-1} $ and
Therefore, since $ \phi_{\alpha}^{\ast}(t)=\inf\{s>0: \lambda_{\phi_{\alpha}}(s)\leq t\} $, we have
where $ \rho_{\theta}(\phi_{\alpha}^{\ast}(t)) $ satisfies
For simplicity, we set $ \rho_{\theta}(t)=\rho_{\theta}(\phi_{\alpha}^{\ast}(t)) $ in the rest of proof. Then,
and $ \rho_{\theta}(t) $ satisfies
Thus, since $ J_{p}(\rho, \theta) $, as a function of $ \rho $ on $ [0, +\infty) $, is monotonically increasing and $ J_{p}(\rho, \theta)\geq J_{p}(0, \theta)=1 $, we have
Therefore, $ \phi_{\alpha}^{\ast}(t)\leq \left(\frac{t}{\omega_{n}}\right)^{-(n-\alpha)/n}, \;\;t>0. $ This completes the proof of Lemma 3.2.
Lemma 3.3 Let $ 0<\alpha<n $ and set $ \widetilde{\phi}_{\alpha}=\frac{1}{\rho^{n-\alpha}f_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta} $, where $ f_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta=\frac{1}{|\mathbb{S}^{n-1}|}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta $. Then
Proof The proof is similar to that given in Lemma 3.2. Set
Denote by $ \rho(s) $ the solution of $ \rho^{n-\alpha}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta=s^{-1} $. Then $ \rho(s) $ satisfies
and
With the same argument as that in the proof of Lemma 3.2, we have
The rest of proof is completely to that given in Lemma 3.2 and we omit it.
For simplicity, we set $ \phi=\phi_{1}=\frac{1}{\rho^{n-\alpha}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)}. $ Then by by Lemma 3.2,
Now we can give the proof of the main result.
Proof of Theorem 1.1
(1) Without loss of generality, we assume $ \Omega\subset B(x_0, R)=\{x\in M: d(x, x_0)< R\} $ for some $ x_0\in M $ and $ R>0 $. Then by (3.1) in [8] we have
With the same arguments as in [9], we have, for some $ A>0 $ and $ \epsilon>0 $,
Applying O'Neil's lemma (see [12], Lemma 1.5), we have, by (3.1) in [8],
i.e.
With the same arguments as in [13], there exists a constant $ C>0 $ independent of $ u $ such that
Now we prove the sharpness of $ \beta_{q} $. Denote by $ B_{r}=\{x\in M:\rho(x)<r\} $. Set, for each $ \varepsilon\in(0, 1) $,
We compute
Following the proof of Lemma 3.3, we have
Therefore,
Substituting $ s=1+\frac{t}{|B_{\varepsilon}|} $ in the integral we have
Now assume that
for some $ \beta>0 $. Using the fact $ f_{\varepsilon}\equiv 1 $ on $ B_{\varepsilon} $, we have
By (4.2), we have
By (2.1), we have
Also by (2.1), one can easily check
Therefore, passing the limit $ \varepsilon\rightarrow 0+ $ in (4.3) yields
(2) Since $ \|\nabla_{M}u\|_{L^{n, \infty}(\Omega)}\leq1 $, we have
Therefore, by (4.1), we have for $ 0<t<|\Omega| $,
Thus, for every $ \beta<\beta_{\infty} $, we have
To see the constant $ \beta_{\infty} $ is sharp, we consider the function
On the other hand, since $ |\nabla_{M}f|=\frac{n}{\beta_{\infty}\rho f_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta}=\frac{1}{\omega^{1/n}_{n}\rho f_{\mathbb{S}^{n-1}}J_{p}(\rho, \theta)d\theta} $, we have, by Lemma 3.3,
and thus
The proof is thereby completed.