Let $ \mathbb{C} $ be the complex plane, for any positive parameter $ \alpha $, we consider
be the Gaussian measure on $ \mathbb{C} $, where $ dA(z) = dxdy $ is the Euclidean area measure on the complex plane. We define the $ \alpha $-fock space $ F^2_\alpha $ as follow:
where $ H(\mathbb{C}) $ is the space of all entire functions. It is easy to show that $ F^2_\alpha $ is a Hilbert space with the following inner product inherited from $ L^2{(\mathbb{C}, d\lambda_\alpha)} $:
accordingly define the norm $ \|f\|_{2, \alpha} $ by
It is well know that the Fock space has become one of the vitally important mathematical tools of quantum physics. Thus, it is significative to study the uncertainty principle for the Fock space. In fact, it was an extensive interest in study of uncertainty principles for fock space $ F^2 $. In particular, some versions uncertainty principles of self-adjoint operators for the fock space $ F^2 $ were obtained, for some details, see [1, 2]. In addition, an inequality of uncertainty principle about the average value and the covariance of self-adjoint operators for the fock space $ F^2 $ also was proved in [1], and this result is due to the uncertainty principle of signal analysis, see for example [3]. On the other hand, The uncertainty principles of linear operators for the fock space $ F^2 $ also can be found in the article [4]. Moreover, we invite the interested reader to see [5, 6, 7] for other perspectives in the study of uncertainty principles see [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Based on these work, our goal here is to introduce a positive parameter $ \alpha $ and extend uncertainty inequalities on two fronts. For one thing, we introduce a positive parameter $ \alpha $ and obtain two different forms uncertainty principles of self-adjoint operators for the $ \alpha $-fock space $ F^2_\alpha $, see Section 2. For another thing, we study the uncertainty principles of linear operators for $ \alpha $-fock space $ F^2_\alpha $, see Section 3.
Note that all results discussed in this article are on the complex plane $ \mathbb{C} $, there is no explanation below.
In [14], an uncertainty principle about self-adjoint operators from functional analysis is stated as follows.
Theorem 1 [14] Suppose $ A $ and $ B $ are self-adjoint operators, possibly unbounded, on Hilbert space $ H $. Then
for all $ f\in {\rm Dom}(AB)\cap {\rm Dom}(BA) $ and all $ a, b\in\mathbb{C} $, where $ {\rm Dom}(AB) $ and $ {\rm Dom}(BA) $ are the domains of the operators $ AB $ and $ BA $, respectively. Here $ [A, B] = AB-BA $ is the commutator of $ A $ and $ B $, and $ I $ is the identity operator. Furthermore, equality in (2.1) holds if and only if $ (A-aI)f $ and $ (B-bI)f $ are purely imaginary scalar multiples of one another.
Proof This result is very useful and widely known, see page 27 of [14] for a proof.
Later, a sharper inequality about (2.1) was provided in [15].
Theorem 2 [15] Suppose $ A $ and $ B $ are self-adjoint operators, possibly unbounded, on Hilbert space $ H $. Then we have
for all $ f\in {\rm Dom}(AB)\cap {\rm Dom}(BA) $ and all $ a, b\in\mathbb{C} $. Here $ [A-aI, B-bI]_+ = (A-aI)(B-bI)+(B-bI)(A-aI) $ and $ I $ is the identity operator.
Proof This is proved. See [15] for some details.
Combining with the above theorems, we construct two natural self-adjoint operators $ A $ and $ B $ such that $ [A, B] $ is a scalar multiple of the identity operator which based on the operator of multiplication by $ z $ and constant multiple of the differentiation operator on $ F^2_\alpha, $ then an uncertainty principle arises. Next, we collect two lemmas which provided a crucial evidence in proving Theorem 3.
Lemma 1 Let $ T:F^2_\alpha\rightarrow F^2_\alpha $ be the constant multiple of the differentiation operator, that is $ (Tf)(z) = \frac{f'(z)}{\alpha} $, then its adjoint $ T^* $ is given by $ (T^*f)(z) = zf(z). $
Proof This is proved. See [16] for some details.
It is very easy to check that
Thus we consider the following two self-adjoint operators on $ F^2_\alpha $:
that is
It follows from [1,2] that, for a function $ f\in F^2_\alpha, $ if $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}\in F^2_\alpha $, then both $ Af $ and $ Bf $ are well defined. If both $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}+zf $ and $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}-zf $ are in $ F^2_\alpha, $ it's obvious that $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha} $ and $ zf $ are in $ F^2_\alpha $. Therefore, the intersection of the domains of $ A $ and $ B $ consists of those function $ f $ such that $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha} $ (or $ zf $) is still in $ F^2_\alpha $. It's possible to identify the domains of $ AB, BA $, and their intersection as well.
Lemma 2 For the operators $ A $ and $ B $ defined above, we have $ [A, B] = -\frac{2}{\alpha}iI $, where $ I $ is the identity operator on $ F^2_\alpha $ and $ i $ is the imaginary unit.
Proof From (2.3) and (2.4), we have
This proves the desired result.
We now derive the first version of the uncertainty principle about self-adjoint operators on $ F^2_\alpha $.
Theorem 3 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $ and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
for all $ a, b\in\mathbb{C}. $ Here $ f'' $ is the second derivative of $ f $.
Proof From (2.4), we get
Also from Lemma 2, we have $ |\langle [A, B]f, f\rangle|^2 = \dfrac{4}{\alpha^2}\|f\|^4_{2, \alpha}, $
This implies that
From the above, the inequality in (2.5) follows from (2.2).
This completes the proof of the theorem.
In order to prove Corollary 1, a discussion about the minimization is also needed.
Lemma 3 If fix some function $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, for any $ a, b\in\mathbb{C} $ and the operators $ T $ and $ T^* $ defined above, we have
and the minimum is attained when
Similarly, we have
Also the minimum is attained when
Proof The conclusion is obviously established. We omit the details.
If $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, we obtain the following corollary of the uncertainty principle.
Corollary 1 If $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof Since $ f $ is a unit vector, from Theorem 3 and its proof, we get
Also
which easily implies that
Then it follows from combining this with the minimization argument of Lemma 3 and
This completes the proof of corollary.
Corollary 2 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof This follows directly from Theorem 3 by setting $ a = b = 0. $
In fact, we can improve the argument above to obtain a more interesting result of uncertainty principle.
Corollary 3 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $ and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha. $ For any $ \delta>0 $, then we have
Proof From Corollary 2, we have the following estimates
which proves the desired result.
Extraordinarily, we now consider several versions of the uncertainty principle which are based on the geometric notions of angle and distance.
Corollary 4 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, not identically zero, and $ \theta_\pm $ are the angles between $ f $ and $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}\pm zf $ in $ F^2_\alpha $. Then we have
here $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha. $
Proof In fact, we have
The same arguement shows that
Applying Corollary 1 with
and
Then we can obtain the desired result.
Corollary 5 Suppose $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, $ \theta_\pm $ are the angles between $ f $ and $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}\pm zf $ in $ F^2_\alpha $, and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha. $ Then for any $ \delta>0 $, we have
Proof This desired result is clear by using the proofs of Corollaries 3 and 4.
Corollary 6 Suppose $ f $ a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, $ \theta_\pm $ are the angles between $ f $ and $ \dfrac{f'}{\alpha}\pm zf $ in $ F^2_\alpha $, and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof This follows directly from Corollary 5 by $ \delta = 1. $
Motivated by Corollary 4, here we get the following results.
Corollary 7 Suppose $ f $ is any function in $ F^2_\alpha $, not identically zero, and $ f', f''\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
where $ [f] = \mathbb{C}f $ is the one-dimensional subspace of $ F^2_\alpha $ spanned by $ f $ and $ d(g, X) $ denotes the distance in $ F^2_\alpha $ from $ g $ to $ X $.
Proof This is an equivalent state of Corollary 4, because
Hence the result is clear from Corollary 4.
Now we can do a significant extension. Actually, all conclusions above that we have done for the $ \alpha $-fock space $ F^2_\alpha $ remains valid for any operator $ T $ and its adjoint operator $ T^* $ which satisfies $ [T, T^*] = mI $, here $ m $ is a positive constant.
Corollary 8 If $ f $ is any function in $ F^2_\alpha $, Suppose $ T $ is any operator on $ F^2_\alpha $ such that $ [T, T^*] = mI $, then we have
here $ m $ is a positive constant.
Proof This follows from the proofs of Lemma 2 and Theorem 3.
It is worth paying attention to the case that when the function $ f' $ (or equivalently, the function $ zf $) also belongs to the $ \alpha $-fock space $ F^2_\alpha $, which is not always the case, the interested reader could see [1] for some details. When the function $ f' $ is not in $ F^2_\alpha $, each of the left-hand sides of the inequalities above is infinite, Hence the inequality always becomes valid.
Next we will obtain a different version uncertainty principle of self-adjoint operators, for this purpose, we first give the following definition which also be found in [1].
Definition 1 [1] If $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, suppose $ P $ is any self-adjoint operator on $ F^2_\alpha $. Then the average value and the covariance of operator $ P $ are defined respectively by
The following lemma plays an important role in proving Theorem 4.
Lemma 4 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, not identically zero, and $ f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof By (2.6) and (2.7), we conclude that
The same procedure may be easily adapted to obtain that
This proves the desired estimate.
Carefully examining the proof of Lemma 4, we obtain the following characterization.
Theorem 4 Let $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, not identically zero, and $ f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
for all $ f\in {\rm Dom}(AB)\cap {\rm Dom}(BA) $. Here $ z = x+iy. $
Proof Recall that
Hence we divide the proof into two steps.
For one thing, we consider the inequality that
Actually, we have
For another thing, we consider the another inequality that
In this section, we turn out our attention to the uncertainty principles of linear operators on $ F^2_\alpha $. To achieve that end, we let $ A^* $ and $ B^* $ be the adjoint of the operators $ A $ and $ B $ respectively. Throughout the article, we shall use the notation
Definition 2 [17] Suppose $ A $ is linear operator with domain and range in the same complex Hilbert space $ H $, for any nonzero $ f\in {\rm Dom}(A) $, we defined
which is equal to
More interestingly, as a generalization of Lemma 3, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 5 If fix some function $ f\in F^2_\alpha $, suppose $ A $ and $ B $ are linear operators on $ F^2_\alpha $. Then for any $ a, b\in \mathbb{C} $, we have
Furthermore, the minimum of (3.3) and (3.4) are attained when $ a = \dfrac{\langle Af, f\rangle}{\|f\|^2_{2, \alpha}}. $ Similarly, we have
Also the minimum of (3.5) and (3.6) are attained when
Proof A direct calculation shows that
or equivalently by (3.1) and (3.2), we have $ \min\limits_ {a\in \mathbb{C}}\|(A-aI)f\|_{2, \alpha} = \Delta_f(A) $ and the minimum is attained when
that is $ a = \dfrac{\langle Af, f\rangle}{\|f\|^2_{2, \alpha}}. $ The same argument may be valid to obtain (3.4)–(3.6).
This finishes the proof of the lemma.
The following theorem on the commutator is another generalization of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Theorem 5 [17] Let $ A $ and $ B $ be linear operators with domain and range in the same complex Hilbert space $ H $, for any nonzero $ f\in {\rm Dom}(A|B) $, there holds
Proof It is very easy to verify that for any nonzero $ f\in {\rm Dom}(A|B) $,
For any $ a, b\in\mathbb{C} $, we replace $ A $ and $ B $ above by $ A-aI $ and $ B-bI $, respectively to obtain that
According to Lemma 5, we conclude that
from which (3.8) follows. and the minimum value is attained uniquely at $ a = \dfrac{\langle Af, f\rangle}{\|f\|^2_{2, \alpha}} $ and $ b = \dfrac{\langle Bf, f\rangle}{\|f\|^2_{2, \alpha}}. $ This completes the desired result.
From Theorem 5, we know that if we find out two linear operators and their adjoint on $ F^2_\alpha $, then an uncertainty principle arises. To this end, we still consider the operator $ T $ and its adjoint $ T^* $ which defined from Lemma 1. To simplify notation, let $ A = T, $ and $ B = T^* $, namely $ A = \dfrac{f'}{\alpha} $ and $ B = zf $. It is obvious that $ A $ and $ B $ are linear operators on $ F^2_\alpha $, and $ A^*f = Bf, B^*f = Af $. Then we characterize the first uncertainty principle of linear operators on $ F^2_\alpha $ as follows.
Theorem 6 Let $ f, f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ for any $ a\in\mathbb{C} $, then we have
Proof From Lemma 1, we have $ [A, B]f = \dfrac{1}{\alpha}f. $ Following the method used in the proof of Theorem 5, we have
More specifically
Note that when $ f' $ is not in $ F^2_\alpha $, the left-hand sides of the inequality of (3.9) is infinite, so the inequality becomes trivial.
When $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, then we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 9 Suppose $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $ and $ f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof Since $ f $ is a unit vector, by Lemma 5, we get
Then the desired corollary can be proved by Theorem 5.
The results in Theorem 6 and Corollary 9 rely upon Theorem 5, on the other hand, the proof of Theorem 5 rely upon (3.8). While in [13], the author try to find two operators $ U $ and $ V $ to reduce the upper bound in (3.8) and require that $ f\in {\rm Dom}(A|B)\cap {\rm Dom}(A|U)\cap {\rm Dom}(B|V)\cap {\rm Dom}(V|U) $ and such that
then we need find two linear operators on $ F^2_\alpha $ which satisfies (2.17), this is a formidable task. For any $ a, b_0, b_1\in\mathbb{C} $, we might as well suppose $ V $ to be a multiple of the identity, namely $ V = aI $, and let another operator $ U = b_0I+b_1A $. Then, it is very easy to check that
$ [V, U]f = (aU-aU)f = 0, $ which shows that $ U $ and $ V $ satisfies (3.10). Hence we can obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 7 Let $ f, f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ for any $ a, b_0, b_1\in\mathbb{C} $, then we have
for all $ f\in {\rm Dom}(A|B)\cap {\rm Dom}(A|U)\cap {\rm Dom}(B|V)\cap {\rm Dom}(V|U) $, and $ a, b_0, b_1\in \mathbb{C}. $
Proof By (3.10), we get
It is very easy to verify that
Then we conclude that
From Lemma 5, we have
and the minimum is attained when $ a = \dfrac{\langle f'/\alpha, f\rangle}{\|f\|^2_{2, \alpha}}. $ Then combining this with the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to the left hand side of (3.11) to obtain the inequality that
This completes the proof of the desired theorem.
When $ f $ is a unit vector, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 10 Let $ f $ is a unit vector in $ F^2_\alpha $, $ f'\in F^2_\alpha, $ then we have
Proof When $ f $ is a unit vector on $ F^2_\alpha $, and by minimization argument, we have
Then we may reach the conclusion just like the computation we performed in the proof of Theorem 7.
For the general case, we can modify the argument above to obtain something more interesting. Before this, we take the the operators $ U $ and $ V $ to be of the form
where $ n $ is a positive integer and $ b_0, b_1, \cdots, b_n, a\in\mathbb{C} $. Let $ f $ be an element in
Note that $ D_1(A|B) = D(A|B) $.
Theorem 8 Let $ f $ is $ k $-th derived function on $ F^2_\alpha $ and $ f^{(k)}\in F^2_\alpha, $ $ U $ and $ V $ are defined by (3.12), then we have
for all $ f\in {\rm Dom}_n(A|B) $, and $ b_0, b_1, \cdots, b_n, a\in F^2_\alpha. $
Proof By Theorem 7 and its proof, we have
Calculate directly that
Consequently, combining with the minimization argument of Lemma 5 and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain
The proof of the theorem is completed.
In addition, it is also possible to obtain an inequality of the case that $ f $ is a unit vector.
Corollary 11 Let $ f $ is $ n $-th derived function on $ F^2_\alpha $ and $ f^{(n)}\in F^2_\alpha, $ $ \|f\|_{2, \alpha} = 1, $ suppose $ U $ and $ V $ are defined by (2.19), then we have
Proof This follow directly from Corollary 10 and Theorem 8 and their proofs.