Singular perturbation theory is a vast and rich ongoing area of exploration for mathematicians, physicists, and other researchers. There are various methods which are used to tackle problems in this field. The more basics of these include the boundary layer method, the methods of matched asymptotic expansion, the method of averaging and multiple scales. During the past decade, many scholars such as O'Malley [1] and Bohé [2], Nayfeh [3] and Howes [4] did a great deal of work. Some domestic scholars such as Jiang [5], Mo [6-11], Ni [12], Tang [13], Han [14], Chen [15] etc. also studied a class of nonlinear boundary value problems for the reaction diffusion equations, a class of activator inhibitor system, the shock wave, the soliton, the laser pulse and the problems of atmospheric physics and so on. The shock wave is an important behavior of solution to singularly perturbed problems. The shock wave of solution implies that the function produces a rapid change and comes into being the shock layer, as an independent variable near the boundary or some interior points of the interval. And the location of shock layer has strong sensitivity with the domain of boundary value. In quantum mechanics, hydrodynamics and electro magnetics, there are many models whose solutions possess the shock behavior. In this paper, we construct asymptotic solution for nonlinear singular perturbed boundary value problems and obtain some expressions of shock solutions, and prove it's uniformly valid.
We consider the following nonlinear singular perturbed boundary value problems
where $\varepsilon$ are positive constants and $0<\varepsilon\ll 1$, $\alpha<0<\beta$.We need the following hypotheses
[H1] $f(x, y)>0$ is sufficiently smooth with respect to their arguments in corresponding domains and $ f_{y}(x, y)<-\delta<0$, where $\delta$ is a positive constant;
[H2] $0<\beta^{2}-\alpha^{2}<2\displaystyle\int^{1}_{0}f(x, 0)dx.$
The reduced equation of $(1)$ is
from the hypotheses, there exists a unique solution to $(4)$,
or
where $y^{l}_{0}(x)$ and $y^{r}_{0}(x)$, respectively, satisfy the left and the right boundary value conditions (2), (3). And clearly, because $y^{l}_{0}(x) \neq y^{r}_{0}(x)$, there may exist a shock solution in interior point of the interval $(0, 1)$.
Let the stretched variable
where $x^{\ast}$ is the shock location, and $\nu$ is a positive constant which will be determined below. Substituting $(7)$ into $(1)$, we have
noting that the special limit can be obtained as $\nu=1$, for inner solution is $Y$ and we have
we assume the inner solution has the form $Y=\sum\limits^{\infty}_{j=0}Y_{j}(\xi)\varepsilon^{j}$, so we have the equation satisfied by the first order approximation $Y_{0}$,
which upon integration gives
where $c_{1}$ is a constant of integration. It must be positive, otherwise $\lim\limits_{\xi\rightarrow\pm\infty}Y_{0}=\mp\infty$ making unmatchable with outer expansions of the solution. Then, separating variables and integrating (10) gives two branches of the first order inner solution $Y_{0}$,
and
where $c_{1}$ is replaced with $k^{2}$, $c_{2}$ the constant of integration. We note that $k$ maybe taken to be positive because $\tanh$ and $\coth$ are odd. The constants $k$ and $c_{2}$ in either form of the inner expansion need to be determined.
By the matching principle, we can determine $k$ and $c_{2}$ from matching the inner and outer solutions. For the shock location $x^{\ast}$ in the interval $(0, 1)$, combining (5) with (6), we can obtain the zero-th order outer solution to problem (1) with (2), (3)
Since the outer solutions must increases from $y^{l}_{0}(x^{\ast})$ to $y^{r}_{0}(x^{\ast})$, thus from (11) and (12) we can obtain the interior solution must be (11), matching it with the zero-th order outer solution (13). For the left zero-th order outer solution and the interior solution, note that as $\varepsilon\rightarrow 0$, $\xi=\frac{x-x^{\ast}}{\varepsilon}\rightarrow-\infty$. Clearly, the outer limit for left side of the interior solution is
the interior limit for the outer solution is
From matching principle, we have
Similarly, for the right zero-th order outer solution and the interior solution. Note that as $\varepsilon\rightarrow 0$, $\xi=\frac{x-x^{\ast}}{\varepsilon}\rightarrow+\infty$, the outer limit for right side of the interior solution is
Comparing with (14), (15), we have
Using the zero theorem and monotonicity, we can prove that (16) has a uniqueness solution $x^{\ast}$, where the shock location $x^{\ast}$ can be determined from (16). From the character of the shock location $x^{\ast}$, it is not difficult to see that $c_{2}=0$ and
So the zero-th order interior solution is $Y_{0}=k\tanh(\frac{k}{2}\xi)$. Then the boundary value problem (1) with (2), (3), exists a solution, and the solution can be asymptotically expanded as
We have the following theorem.
Theorem Under hypotheses [H1]-[H2], there exists a solution $y$ of the nonlinear singular perturbed boundary value problems (1)-(3), and the solution $y$ can be expanded into the uniformly valid asymptotic expansion
where
Proof The theorem includes two estimates
Now we prove estimate $(19)$. Similarly, we can prove (20). We use the theory of differential inequalities, first we construct the auxiliary functions $\underline{y}(x, \varepsilon)$ and $\overline{y}(x, \varepsilon)$,
where $x\in[0, x^{\ast}]$,
$\gamma$ is a large enough positive constant to be chosen below. Obviously, we have
Now we prove that
From hypotheses [H1], [H2], and considering the character of the tanh, there exists a positive constant $M$, such that
where constant
from hypothesis [H1], $f_{y}'(x, y)<-\delta<0$ and
There exist a positive constant $\rho$,
so selecting $\gamma\geq\frac{M}{\rho}-\delta$, $\varepsilon\overline{y}''+\overline{y}\ \overline{y}'-f(x, \varepsilon\overline{y}')\leq M\varepsilon-\rho(\gamma+\delta)\varepsilon\leq0.$
We prove inequality (26). Similarly, we can prove inequality (25) too. Thus from inequalities (23)-(26), by using the theorem of differential inequalities, there is a solution $y(x)$ of problems (1)-(3), such that
then we have equation (19). Similarly, we can prove (20). The proof of the theorem is completed.