Suppose that $\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ is the unit sphere in $\mathbb{R}^{n}(n\geq2)$ equipped with the normalized Lebesgue measure $d\sigma$. Let $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})(1<s\leq\infty)$ be homogeneous of degree zero and satisfy the cancellation condition
where $x^{'}=\frac{x}{|x|}$ for any $x\neq 0$. The Lusin-area integral $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ is defined by
where
Moreover, let $\vec{b}=(b_1, b_2, ..., b_m), $ where $b_i\in L_{loc}{(\mathbb{R}^n)}$ for $1\leq i\leq m.$ Then the multilinear commutator generated by $\vec{b}$ and $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ can be defined as follows:
It is well known that the Lusin-area integral plays an important role in harmonic analysis and PDE (for example, see [1-8]). Therefore, it is a very interesting problem to discuss the boundedness of the Lusin area integral. In [2], Ding, Fan and Pan studied the weighted $L^p$ boundedness of the area integral $\mu_{\Omega, S}.$ In [3], the authors investigated the boundeness of $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ on the weighted Morrey spaces. The commutators generated by $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ attract much attention, also. In [5] and [6], the authors discuss the weighted $L^p$ boundedness and endpoint estimates for the higher order commutators generated by $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ and BMO function, respectively. In [8], the authors showed that the commutator generated by $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ and $VMO$ is a compact operator in the Morrey space.
Moreover, the classical Morrey space $M_{p, \lambda}$ were first introduced by Morrey in [9] to study the local behavior of solutions to second order elliptic partial differential equations. And, in [10], the authors introduced the local generalized Morrey space $LM_{p, \varphi}^{\{x_{0}\}}$, and they also studied the boundedness of the homogeneous singular integrals with rough kernel on these spaces.
Motivated by the works of [2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 13], we are going to consider the boundedness of $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ on the local generalized Morrey space $LM_{p, \varphi}^{\{x_0\}}, $ as well as the boundedness of the commutators generated by $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ and local Campanato functions.
Definition 2.1 [10] Let $\varphi(x, r)$ be a positive measurable function on $\mathbb{R}^n\times(0, \infty)$ and $1\leq p\leq\infty.$ For any fixed ${x}_{0}\in\mathbb{R}^n, $ a function $f\in L_{\rm{loc}}^{q}$ is said to belong to the local Morrey space, if
And, we denote
According to this definition, we recover the local Morrey space$ {LM}^{\{x_0\}}_{p, \lambda}$ under the choice $\varphi(x_0, r)=r^{\frac{\lambda-n}{p}}.$
Definition 2.2 [10] Let $1\leq q<\infty$ and $0\leq\lambda<\frac{1}{n}.$ A function $f\in L_{\rm{loc}}^{q}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is said to belong to the space $LC_{q, \lambda}^{\{x_0\}}$ (local Campanato space), if
Define
Remark 2.1 [10] Note that, the central $BMO$ space $CBMO_{q}(\mathbb{R}^n)=LC_{q, 0}^{\{0\}}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $CBMO_{q}^{\{x_0\}}(\mathbb{R}^n)=LC_{q, 0}^{\{x_0\}}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ Moreover, imagining that the behavior of $CBMO_{q}^{\{x_0\}}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ may be quite different from that of $BMO(\mathbb{R}^n), $ since there is no analogy of the John-Nirenberg inequality of $BMO$ for the space $CBMO_{q}^{\{x_0\}}(\mathbb{R}^n).$
Lemma 2.1 [10] Let $1<q<\infty, $ $0<r_2<r_1$ and $b\in LC_{q, \lambda}^{\{x_0\}}, 0\leq\lambda<\frac{1}{n}, $ then
And, from this inequality, we have
In this section, we are going to use the following statement on the boundedness of the weighted Hardy operator:
where $w$ is a fixed function non-negative and measurable on $(0, \infty).$
Lemma 2.2 [11, 12] Let $v_1, v_2$ and $w$ be positive almost everywhere and measurable functions on $(0, \infty).$ The inequality
holds for some $C>0$ and all non-negative and non-decreasing $g$ on$~(0, \infty)~$if and only if
Moreover, if $\tilde{C}$ is the minimum value of $C$ in (2.1), then $\tilde{C}=B$.
Lemma 2.3 [2] Suppose that $1<q, s\leq\infty$ and $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})$ satisfying (1.1). If $q, s$ and weighted function $w$ satisfy one of the following conditions:
(ⅰ) max$\{s^{'}, 2\}=\eta<q<\infty, $ and $w\in A_{q/{\eta}}, $
(ⅱ) $2<q<s, $ and $w^{1-(q/2)^{'}}\in A_{q^{'}/s^{'}}, $
(ⅲ) $2\leq q<\infty, $ and $w^{s^{'}}\in A_{q/2}, $
then the operator $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ is bounded on $L^q(w, \mathbb{R}^{n})$ space, where $s'=\frac{s}{s-1}$ is the conjugate exponent of $s.$
Remark 2.2 From Lemma 2.3, it's obvious that when $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}) (1<s\leq\infty)$ satisfies the condition (1.1), the operator $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ is bounded on $L^q(R^n)$ space for $2\leq q<\infty.$
Theorem 3.1 Let $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}) (1<s\leq\infty)$ satisfy the condition (1.1) and $\max\{2, s'\}<q<\infty, $ where $s'=\frac{s}{s-1}$ is the conjugate exponent of $s.$ Then, the inequality
holds for any ball $B(x_0, r).$
Proof Let $B=B(x_0, r).$ We write $f=f_1+f_2, $ where $f_1=f\chi_{2B}$ and $f_2=f\chi_{(2B)^c}.$ Thus, we have
Since $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ is bounded on $L^q(\mathbb{R}^n)$ space (see Lemma 2.3), then it follows that
Our attention will be focused now on $|\mu_{\Omega, S}f_2(x)|$ for $x\in B.$
Without loss of generality, we can assume that for any $x\in B, $ $(y, t)\in \Gamma(x)$ and $z\in 2^{j+1}B\setminus2^{j}B, $ we have $B(x, t)\bigcap B(z, t)\neq\varnothing.$ Thus, there exists $y_0\in B(x, t)\bigcap B(z, t), $ such that
Hence
When $\Omega\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), $ it follows from the Hölder's inequality that
When $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), 1<s<\infty, $ it is obvious that
Thus from Hölder's inequality and (3.4), we have
So
Therefore combining (3.1) and (3.6), we have
Thus we complete the proof of Theorem 3.1.
Theorem 3.2 Let $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})~ (1<s\leq\infty)$ satisfy condition (1.1) and $\max\{2, s'\}<q<\infty.$ Then, if functions $\varphi, $ $\psi:$ $\mathbb{R}^n\times(0, \infty)\rightarrow(0, +\infty)$ satisfy the inequality
where $C$ does not depend on $x$ and $r, $ the operator $\mu_{\Omega, S}$ is bounded from $LM_{p, \varphi}^{\{x_0\}}$ to $LM_{p, \psi}^{\{x_0\}}.$
Proof Taking $v_1(l)=\varphi(x_0, l)^{-1}l^{-\frac{n}{q}}, $ $v_2(l)=\psi(x_0, l)^{-1}, $ $g(l)=\|f\|_{L^q(B(x_0, l))}$ and $w(l)=l^{-\frac{n}{q}-1}, $ then from Theorem 3.1, we have
Thus from Lemma 2.2, it follows that
Therefore
Thus we complete the proof of Theorem 3.2.
Theorem 4.1 Let $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})~ (1<s\leq\infty)$ satisfy condition (1.1) and $\max\{2, s'\}<q<\infty.$ Let $1<p, q_1, q_2, \cdots, q_m<\infty, $ such that $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{q_m}, $ and $b_i\in LC_{q_i, \lambda_i}^{\{x_0\}}$ for $0\leq\lambda_i<\frac{1}{n}, i=1, 2, \cdots, m.$ Then the inequality
holds for any ball $B(x_0, r), $ where $\lambda=\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\cdots+\lambda_m.$
Proof Without loss of generality, it is sufficient for us to show that the conclusion holds for $m=2.$
Let $B=B(x_0, r).$ And we write $f=f_1+f_2, $ where $f_1=f\chi_{2B}, $ $f_2=f\chi_{{(2B)}^c}.$ Thus we have
Let us estimate $I$ and $II, $ respectively. It is obvious that
From Lemma 2.1, it is easy to see that
Since $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}+\frac{1}{p}$ and $\max\{2, s'\}<q<\infty.$ It is obvious that $\max\{2, s'\}<p<\infty.$ Thus using Hölder's inequality, Theorem 3.1 and (4.1), we have
Moreover, from Lemma 2.1, it is easy to see that
And let $\frac{1}{\bar{q}}=\frac{1}{q_2}+\frac{1}{p}.$ Then it is easy to see that $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{\bar{q}}$ and $\max\{s', 2\}<\bar{q}<\infty.$ Then similarly to the estimate of (4.2), we have
Similarly,
Similarly, since $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}+\frac{1}{p}.$ Then, by Lemma 2.3, Hölder's inequality and (4.3), we obtain
Therefore combining the estimates of $I_1, I_2, I_3$ and $I_4, $ we have
Let us estimate $II.$
Since $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}+\frac{1}{p}.$ Then using Hölder's inequality and (3.6), we have
In the following, let us estimate $II_2.$ For $x\in B, $ when $\Omega\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), $ from Lemma 2.1 and estimate of (3.3), we have
For $x\in B, $ when $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), 1<s<\infty, $ from Lemma 2.1 and the estimate of (3.5), it follows that
Let $1<\tilde{q}<\infty$ such that $\frac{1}{\tilde{q}}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q_2}, $ then $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{\tilde{q}}$ and $\max\{2, s'\}<\tilde{q}<\infty.$ Thus, from Hölder's inequality, (4.4) and (4.5), we obtain
Let us estimate $II_4.$ It is analogue to the estimates of (4.4), (4.5) and (4.6), we have the following estimates.
When $x\in B, $ $\Omega\in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), $ we have
When $x\in B, $ $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}), 1<s<\infty, $ we have
Therefore from (4.7) and (4.8), we have
So from the estimates of $II_1, II_2, II_3$ and $II_4, $ it follows that
Therefore from the estimates of $I$ and $II, $ we deduced that
Thus the proof of Theorem 4.1 is completed.
Theorem 4.2 Let $\Omega\in L^s(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})~ (1<s\leq\infty)$ satisfy condition (1.1) and $\max\{2, s'\}<q<\infty.$ Let $1<p, q_1, q_2, \cdots, p_m<\infty, $ such that $\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q_1}+\frac{1}{q_2}+\cdots+\frac{1}{q_m}, $ and $b\in LC_{q_i, \lambda_i}^{\{x_0\}}$ for $0\leq\lambda_i<\frac{1}{n}, i=1, 2, \cdots, m.$ Then, if functions $\varphi, $ $\psi:$ $\mathbb{R}^n\times(0, \infty)\rightarrow(0, +\infty)$ satisfy the inequality
where $\lambda=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{m}\lambda_i$ and the constant $C>0$ doesn't depend on $r.$ Then $\mu_{\Omega, S}^{\vec{b}}$ is bounded from $LM_{p, \varphi}^{\{x_0\}}$ to $LM_{q, \psi}^{\{x_0\}}.$
Proof Taking $v_1(l)=\varphi(x_0, l)^{-1}l^{-\frac{n}{p}}, $ $v_2(l)=\psi(x_0, l)^{-1}, $ $g(l)=\|f\|_{L^{q}(B(x_0, l))}$ and $w(l)=(1+\ln\frac{l}{r})^{m}l^{n\lambda-\frac{n}{p}-1}.$ It is easy to see that
Thus by Lemma 2.2, we have
Thus the proof of Theorem 4.2 is finished.