数学杂志  2017, Vol. 37 Issue (6): 1173-1176   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
ZHAO Lei-na
A PROPER AFFINE SPHERE THEOREM RELATED TO HOMOGENEOUS FUNCTIONS
ZHAO Lei-na    
College of Mathematics and Statistics; College of Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
Abstract: In this paper, we focus on the affine sphere theorem related to homogeneous function. Based on Hopf maximum principle, we obtain that the affine sphere theorem does hold for given elementary symmetric curvature problems under concavity conditions. In particular, it gives a new proof of Deicke's theorem on homogeneous functions.
Key words: affine sphere theorem     homogeneous functions    
齐次函数的一个仿射球定理
赵磊娜    
重庆交通大学数学与统计学院; 交通运输学院, 重庆 400074
摘要:本文研究了相关齐次函数的仿射球定理.利用Hopf极大值原理,对任意给定的带凹性条件的初等对称曲率问题,获得了此类仿射球定理.特别地,这也给出了Deicke齐次函数定理的一个新证明.
关键词仿射球定理    齐次函数    
1 Main theorems

Let $L$ be a positive function of class $C^4(\mathbb R^n/\{0\})$ with homogeneous of degree one. Introducing a matrix $g$ of elements

$\begin{equation} \label{eq:1} g_{ij}=\frac{\partial^2\left(\frac{L^2}{2}\right)}{\partial x_i\partial x_j}, \end{equation}$

Deicke [4] showed that the matrix $g$ is positive and the following theorem, a short and elegant proof was presented in Brickell [1].

Theorem 1.1  Let $\det g$ be a constant on $\mathbb R^n/\{0\}.$ Then $g$ is a constant matrix on $\mathbb R^n/\{0\}$.

Theorem 1.1 is very important in affine geometry [10, 11, 13] and Finsler geometry [4]. There are lots of papers introducing the history and progress of these problems, for example [7]. A laplacian operator and Hopf maximum principle is the key point of Deicke [4] 's proof. However, our method depends on the concavity of the fully nonlinear operator, we give a new method to prove more generalized operator than Theorem 1.1, for considering operator $F(g),$ which including the operator of determinant.

Theorem 1.2  Let $F(g)$ be a constant on $\mathbb R^n/\{0\},$ $F(g)$ be concave with respect to matrix $g,$ and the matrix $[F^{ij}]_{1\leq i,j\leq n}=[\frac{\partial F}{\partial g_{ij}}]_{1\leq i,j\leq n}$ be positive semi-definite. Then $g$ is a constant matrix on $\mathbb R^n/\{0\}$.

In fact

(1) If $F(g)=\log \det g,$ Theorem 1.2 is just Theorem 1.1.

(2) An interesting example of Theorem 1.2 is $F(g)=(S_k(g))^{\frac 1k},$ where $S_k(g)$ is the elementary symmetric polynomial of eigenvalues of $g.$ The concavity of $F(g)$ was from Caffarelli-Nirenberg-Spruck [3]. A similar Liouville problem for the $S_2$ equation was obtained in [2].

It is easy to see that the method of Brickell [1] does not apply to our Theorem 1.2.

On the other hand, there are some remarkable results for homogeneous solution to partial differential equations. Han-Nadirashvili-Yuan [6] proved that any homogeneous order $1$ solution to nondivergence linear elliptic equations in $\mathbb R^3$ must be linear, and Nadirashvili-Yuan [8] proved that any homogeneous degree other than $2$ solution to fully nonlinear elliptic equations must be "harmonic". In fact, our methods can also be used to deal with the following hessian type equations

$\begin{equation} F(D^2 u)={\rm constant}. \end{equation}$ (1.2)

More recently, Nadirashvili-Vlăduţ [9] obtained the following theorem.

Theorem 1.3  Let $u$ be a homogeneous order 2 real analytic function in $\mathbb R^4/\{0\}$. If $u$ is a solution of the uniformly elliptic equation $F(D^2u)=0$ in $\mathbb R^4/\{0\}$, then $u$ is a quadratic polynomial.

However, our theorem say that above theorem holds provided $F$ with some concavity/convexity property. Pingali [12] can show for 3-dimension, there is concave operator $G$ form $F$ without some concavity/convexity property, for example

$ F(D^2u)=\det D^2u+\Delta u $

for $\lambda_1\leq \lambda_2\leq\lambda_3$ are eigenvalues of hessian matrix $D^2u.$ Then

$ G(\lambda_1,\lambda_2, \lambda_3)=\int_{36}^{\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3+\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3}\exp(-\frac{t^2}2)dt $

has a uniformly positive gradient and is concave if $\lambda_1 > 3.$ That is to say, using our methods, there is a simple proof of Theorem 1.3 if one can construct a concave operator with respect to $F$ in Theorem 1.3.

2 Proof of Theorem 1.2

Here we firstly list the Hopf maximum principle to be used in our proof, see for example [5].

Lemma 2.1  Let $u$ be a $C^2$ function which satisfies the differential inequality

$\begin{equation} Lu=a^{ij}\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x_i\partial x_j}+b^i\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}\geq 0 \end{equation}$ (2.1)

in an open domain $\Omega$, where the symmetric matrix $a^{ij}$ is locally uniformly positive definite in $\Omega$ and the coefficients $a^{ij},b^i$ are locally bounded. If $u$ takes a maximum value $M$ in $\Omega$ then $u\equiv M.$

Proof of Theorem 1.2 Differentiating this equation twice with respect to $x$

$F(g)={\rm constant},$

one has

$ F^{ij}g_{ijkl}+F^{ij,pq}g_{ijk}g_{pql}=0, $

where $F^{ij}=\frac{\partial F}{\partial g_{ij}},$ $ F^{ij, pq}=\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial g_{ij}\partial g_{pq}},$ $g_{ijk}=\frac{\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x_k},$ and $g_{ijkl}=\frac{\partial^2 g_{ij}}{\partial x_k \partial x_l}.$

The concavity of $F(g)$ with respect to $g$ says that the matrix $J_{kl}=F^{ij}g_{ijkl}$ is positive semi-definite. In particular,

$\begin{equation} \label{hjm} F^{ij}g_{ijkk}\geq 0. \end{equation}$ (2.2)

We firstly consider (2.2) as an inequality in unit sphere $S^{n-1}$,

$\begin{equation} F^{ij}g_{ijkk}\geq 0,\quad S^{n-1}, \end{equation}$ (2.3)

that is to say using Hopf maximum principle of Lemma 2.1 and taking $\Omega=S^{n-1}$, it shows that $g_{kk}$ is constant on $S^{n-1}$, and it is so on $\mathbb R^n/\{0\}$ because $g_{kk}$ is positively homogeneous of degree zero. Then, owing to the matrix $F^{ij}g_{ijkl}$ be positive semi-definite

$ F^{ij}g_{ijkl}=0. $ (1.1)

Using Hopf maximum principle again and $g_{kl}$ is positively homogeneous of degree zero, then the matrix $g$ is constant matrix. We complete the proof of Theorem 1.2.

References
[1] Brickell F. A new proof of Deicke's theorem on homogeneous functions[J]. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 1965, 16: 190–191.
[2] Chang S Y A, Yuan Y. A Liouville problem for the sigma-2 equation[J]. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 2010, 28(2): 659–664. DOI:10.3934/dcdsa
[3] Caffarelli L, Nirenberg L, Spruck J. The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations. Ⅲ. Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian[J]. Acta Math., 1985, 155(3-4): 261–301.
[4] Deicke A. Über die Finsler-Räume mit Ai=0[J]. Arch. Math., 1953, 4: 45–51. DOI:10.1007/BF01899750
[5] Gilbarg D, Trudinger N S. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order (2nd ed.)[M]. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 224, Berlin: Springer, 1983.
[6] Han Q, Nadirashvili N, Yuan Y. Linearity of homogeneous order-one solutions to elliptic equations in dimension three[J]. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 2003, 56(4): 425–432. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0312
[7] Huang Y, Liu J, Xu L. On the uniqueness of Lp-Minkowski problems:the constant p-curvature case in R3[J]. Adv. Math., 2015, 281: 906–927. DOI:10.1016/j.aim.2015.02.021
[8] Nadirashvili N, Yuan Y. Homogeneous solutions to fully nonlinear elliptic equations[J]. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2006, 134(6): 1647–1649. DOI:10.1090/S0002-9939-06-08367-5
[9] Nadirashvili N, Vlǎduţ S. Homogeneous solutions of fully nonlinear elliptic equations in four dimensions[J]. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 2013, 66(10): 1653–1662. DOI:10.1002/cpa.21456
[10] Nomizu K, Sasaki T. Affine differential geometry[M]. Cambridge Tracts Math., 111, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
[11] Petty C M. Affine isoperimetric problems[A]. Discrete geometry and convexity[C]. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. , 440, New York: New York Acad. Sci. , 1982, 113-127.
[12] Pingali V P. On a generalised Monge-Ampere equation[J]. arXiv: 1205. 1266, 2012.
[13] Tzitzéica G. Sur une nouvelle classe de surfaces[J]. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 1908, 25: 180-187; 1909, 28: 210-216.
[14] Zhang S. Rigidity theorem for complete hypersurfaces in unite sphere[J]. J. Math., 2014, 34(4): 804–808.