The notion of dually flat Riemannian metrics was initially introduced by Amari and Nagaoka [1] when they studied information geometry in 2000. A Finsler metric $F=F(x, y)$ on an $m$-dimensional manifold $M$ is called locally dually flat if at every point there is a coordinate system $(x^{i})$ in which the spray coefficients are in the following form
where $H=H(x, y)$ is a local scalar function on the tangent bundle $TM$ of $M$. Such a coordinate system is called an adapted coordinate system. Subsequently, without the quadratic restriction, the notion of dually flatness was extend to Finsler metrics by Shen when he studied Finsler information geometry [2]. In [2], Shen proved that a Finsler metric $F=F(x, y)$ on an open subset $U\subset\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is dually flat if and only if it satisfies the following equations
In this case, $H=-\frac{1}{6}[F^2]_{x^l}y^l$. The dually flatness of Randers metrics was studied by Cheng et al. [3]. Xia gave a characterization of locally dually flat $(\alpha, \beta)$-metrics on an $m$-dimensional manifold $M$ $(m\geq3)$ [4]. Li found a new method to construct locally dually flat Finsler metrics by using a projectively flat Finsler metric under the condition that the projective factor is also a Finsler metric [5]. Huang and Mo manufactured new examples of dually flat spherically symmetric Finsler metrics [6]. From the relation between the sprays of two dually flat and conformally flat $(\alpha, \beta)$-metrics, Cheng obtained that locally dually flat and conformally flat Randers metrics are Minkowskian [7]. By using a new kind of deformation technique, Yu constructed many non-trivial explicit dually flat general $(\alpha, \beta)$-metrics and showed us that the dual flatness of an $(\alpha, \beta)$-metric always arises from that of some Riemannian metric in dimensional $m\geq3$ [8-9].
On the other hand, the study of spherically symmetric Finsler metrics attracted a lot of attention. Many known Finsler metrics are spherically symmetric [5-6, 8]. A Finsler metric $F$ is said to be spherically symmetric (orthogonally invariant in an alternative terminology in [10]) if $F$ satisfies
for all $A\in O(m)$, equivalently, if the orthogonal group $O(m)$ acts as isometrics of $F$. Such metrics were first introduced by Rutz [11].
It was pointed out in [10] that a Finsler metric $F$ on $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$ is a spherically symmetric if and only if there is a function $\phi: [0, \mu)\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that
where $(x, y)\in T\mathbb{R}^m(\mu)\backslash \{0\}$, $\mid \cdot \mid$ and $\langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle$ denote the standard Euclidean norm and inner product respectively. The spherically symmetric Finsler metric of form (1.3) can be rewritten as the following form [6]
Spherically symmetric Finsler metrics are the simplest and most important general $(\alpha, \beta)$-metrics [12]. Mo, Zhou and Zhu classified the projective spherically symmetric Finsler metrics with constant flag curvature in [13-15]. A lot of spherically symmetric Finsler metrics with nice curvature properties was investigated by Mo, Huang et al. [10, 13-16].
An important example of non-Riemmannian dually flat Finsler metrics is the Funk metric
on the unit ball $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$, where $y\in T_{x}\mathbb{B}^{m}\subset \mathbb{R}^{m}$. Huang and Mo in [6] decomposed the Funk metric $\Theta$ in the form
where
here $\Theta_{1}$ and $\Theta_{2}$ satisfy (1.1) by straightforward calculations. It's easy to see that if $\Theta_{1}$ and $\Theta_{2}$ satisfy (1.1) then $\sqrt{a\Theta_{1}^{2}+b\Theta_{2}^{2}}$ is also a solution of (1.1) where $a, b$ are non-negative constants. After noting this interesting fact, the two authors discussed the solution of dually flat Eq.(1.1) in the following forms
and
On the other hand, there is a new example of non-Riemmannian dually flat Finsler metrics given in [5, 8],
on the unit ball $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$, where $y\in T_{x}\mathbb{B}^{m}\subset \mathbb{R}^{m}$. The metric $F$ can be expressed in the form
We can verify that $F_{1}$ and $F_{2}$ satisfy (1.1) by direct calculations.
Inspired by the results achieved in [6], the fundamental property of the dually flat eq.(1, 1) and the metric given in (1.6), in this papar, we try to find the solution of the dually flat eq.(1.1) in the following forms
By the solutions we find, a lot of new dually flat Finsler metrics can be constructed. Through caculations, we have the following conclusions.
Theorem 1.1 Let $f(t, s)$ be a function defined by
where $b$ is a constant and $g(t)$ and $\lambda(t)$ are any differentiable functions. $h(t)$ is an any polynomial function of $N$ degree where $N\leq n$ and $h^{(j)}$ denotes the $j$-order derivative for $h(t)$. Then the following spherically symmetric Finsler metric on $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$,
is dually flat if and only if $r=2$.
Theorem 1.2 Let $f(t, s)$ be a function defined by
where $b$ is a constant and $g(t)$ and $\lambda(t)$ are any differentiable functions, $h(t)$ is an any polynomial function of $N$ degree where $N\leq n$ and $h^{(j)}$ denotes the $j$-order derivative for $h(t)$. Then the following spherically symmetric Finsler metric on $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$,
is dually flat if and only if $r=2$, at this time,
where $C_{1}, C_{2}$ are constants.
Remark 1 Let us take a look at a special case $b=1$, $C_{1}=0$, $C_{2}=3$, setting $g(t)=\frac{1}{(1-2t)^{2}}$, $h(t)=0, $ the metric in Theorem 1.2 is given by
It is also obtained by Li [5] and Yu [8] in other different ways.
Lemma 2.1 [6] $F=\mid y\mid\sqrt{f(\frac{\mid x\mid^2}{2}, \frac{\langle x, y\rangle}{\mid y\mid})}$ is a solution of (1.1) if and only if $f$ satisfies
where $t=\frac{\mid x\mid^2}{2}$ and $s=\frac{\langle x, y\rangle}{\mid y\mid}$.
The solution $f$ of (2.1) where $f=f(t, s)$ given by $f(t, s)=\sum \limits_{j=0}^{l}f_{j}(t)s^{j}$ and $f(t, s)=\sqrt{\sum \limits_{j=0}^{l}f_{j}(t)s^{j}}$ was discussed in [6]. Meanwhile, the following propositions were obtained.
Proposition 2.1 $F=\mid y\mid\sqrt{f(\frac{\mid x\mid^2}{2}, \frac{\langle x, y\rangle}{\mid y\mid})}$ in the form
is a solution of the dually flat eq.(2.1) if and only if $f(t, s)$ satisfies
Proposition 2.2 We have the following solutions of (2.1),
where $\lambda(t)$ is an any differentiable function.
Now let us consider the solution given by
By a direct calculation,
Putting together (2.2), (2.3), (2.4), we have
here we use of the following lemma.
Lemma 2.2 We have the following equations
Differentiating (2.3), we get
Similarity, by using Lemma 2.2, we have
By using (2.2) and Lemma 2.2, we obtain
Putting together (2.5), (2.6), (2.7), we have the following
As $F=|y|f(\frac{|x|^{2}}{2}, \frac{\langle x, y\rangle}{|y|})$ on $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$ is dually flat, by using (2.1), we obtain the following equations
Let us focus on a special case $l=4$ and $f_{1}(t)=f_{3}(t)=0$, then
From (2.9), we know
or
Case 1 Plugging (2.14) to (2.10) we get
Substituting (2.14), (2.15) into (2.11) yields
If $f_{0}'(t)=0$, $f(t, s)=0$. As $f_{0}(t)\neq0$, $f_{0}'(t)\neq0$ and $r\neq1$, we obtain
Putting (2.14), (2.15), (2.17) into (2.12), the equality holds. Then
Case 2 Plugging (2.13) to (2.10) we know
If $r=2, $ the results are the same as Mo's in [9]. If $r\neq2$, $r\neq4$, then $f(t, s)=0.$ If $r=4, $ $f_{0}=f_{2}=0$, $f_{4}$ is an arbitrary function.
Combine Propositions 2.1, 2.2, (2.17), (2.18) and the fundamental property of the dually flat eq.(1.1), Theorem 1.1 can be achieved.
In this section, we are going to construct more dually flat Finsler metrics. Consider the spherically symmetric Finsler metric $F=\mid y\mid\sqrt{f(\frac{\mid x\mid^2}{2}, \frac{\langle x, y\rangle}{\mid y\mid})}$ on $\mathbb{B}^{m}(\mu)$ where $f=f(t, s)$ is given by
Suppose that $g(t, s)=(1-2t+s^{2})^{-\frac{1}{r}}, $ (3.1) can be written as
Thus
Differentiating (3.1), by using (3.2), we get
Plugging (3.3), (3.5), (3.6) into the dually flat eq.(2.1) we get the following
Multiplying $g^{-r}$ on the above equation, then
From (3.7), we obtain the following
Let us take a look at a special case $l=4, $ $f_{2}(t)=f_{4}(t)=0, $ then
From (3.12), we know that
Plugging (3.17) into (3.13),
From (3.14), we obtain
Differentiating (3.19),
Substituting (3.19), (3.20) into (3.15) yields
where $C_{1}, C_{2}$ are constants. Plugging (3.20) into (3.16), if $r\neq2$,
where $C_{3}, C_{4}$ are constants. Obviously, $f_{1}(t)$ in (3.21) and $f_{1}(t)$ in (3.22) are not the same. Thus
Meanwhile, substituting (3.23) into (3.21), we obtain
Though the above analysis, we get the following proposition.
Proposition 3.1 We have the following solutions of (2.1),
where $\lambda(t)$ satisfies
Combine Propositions 2.1, 3.1, (3.23) and the fundamental property of the dually flat eq.(1.1), Theorem 1.2 can be achieved.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank Professor Mo Xiaohua for the discussions held on this topic.