Throughout this paper, the unit disc is denoted by $\mathbb{D}$. The Möbius transformation of $\mathbb{D}$ is defined by
Definition 1.1 Let $K : [0, \infty) \rightarrow [0, \infty) $ be a right-continuous and nondecreasing function. An analytic function $f$ on the unit disc is said to belongs to the space $Q_K$ if
where $dA(z)$ is the Euclidean area element on $\mathbb{D}$ so that $A(\mathbb{D})=1$.
Equipped with the norm $|f(0)|+\|f\|_{Q_K}$, the space $Q_K$ is Banach. We know that the space $Q_K$ is Möbius invariant in the sense that $\|f\circ\varphi_a\|_{Q_K}=\|f\|_{Q_K}$ for any $a\in\mathbb{D}$. See [5] and [6] for a general theory of $Q_K$ spaces. By [5] we know that $Q_K$ spaces are contained in the Bloch space. Recall that an analytic function $f$ on the unit disc is said to belong to the Bloch space, denoted by $\mathcal{B}$, if
The Hardy space $H^\infty$ consists of all analytic $f$ on the unit disk $\mathbb{D}$ for which $\sup\limits_{z\in\mathbb{D}}|f(z)|<\infty.$ A sequence $\{z_n\}\subset\mathbb{D}$ is called an interpolating sequence for $Q_K\cap H^\infty$ if each bounded sequence $\{w_n\}$ of complex numbers there exists $f\in Q_K\cap H^\infty$ such that $f(z_n)=w_n$ for all $n$.
In this paper the weight function $K$ satisfies
Otherwise, the space $Q_K$ only contains constant functions. By Theorem 2.1 in [5] we may assume that $K$ is defined on [0, 1] and extend its domain to $[0, \infty)$ by setting $K(t)=K(1)$ for $t>1$.
We need the following two conditions on $K$:
and
where
For a subarc $I\subset\partial\mathbb{D}$, let $\theta$ be the midpoint of $I$ and denote the Carleson box
for $|I|\leq 1$ and $S(I)=\mathbb{D}$ for $|I|>1$.
Definition 1.2 A positive measure $d\mu$ is said to be a $K$-Carleson measure on $\mathbb{D}$ provided
The interpolation problems for different analytic function spaces were discussed in many paper (see [2, 3, 10, 13, 14]). A well-known result of Carleson (see [3]) asserts that $\{z_n\}$ is an interpolating sequence for $H^\infty$ if and only if $d\mu=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a Carleson measure and $\{z_n\}$ is separated, that is
In this paper, we study the interpolation problem in the analytic function space $Q_K\cap H^\infty$. The main result is the following:
Theorem 1.1 Let $K$ satisfy conditions (1.2) and (1.3). Then $\{z_n\}$ is an interpolating sequence for $Q_K\bigcap H^\infty$ if and only if $\{z_n\}$ is separted and $d\mu=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a $K$-Carleson measure.
In addition, we say that $f\lesssim g$ (for two functions $f$ and $g$) if there exists a constant $C$ (independent of $f$ and $g$) such that $f(t)\leq Cg(t), t>0$. We say $f\thickapprox g$ (that is, $f$ is comparable with $g$) whenever $f\lesssim g\lesssim f$.
We give some auxiliary lemmas that will be needed in the proof of the main result.
Lemma 2.1 If conditions (1.2) and (1.3) hold, then the weight $K$ has the following proposition:
(1) $K(t)/t^c$ is non-decreasing for some $c>0$.
(2) $K(t)/t^{p}$ is non-increasing for some $0<p<1$.
(3) $K(2t)\approx K(t)$ for any $0<t<\infty$.
The above result can be found in [6].
Remark 2.2 If conditions (1.2) and (1.3) hold, then the space $Q_K$ is a subset of $D_p$ for some $0<p<1$ by Lemma 2.1, where the space $D_p$ consists of all analytic function $f$ on $\mathbb{D}$ such that
Lemma 2.3 Let $K$ satisfy conditions (1.2) and (1.3). There is a constant C (independent of $w$) such that
for any given $w\in\mathbb{D}$ and $q\geq 0$.
Proof In our proof we borrowed a technique from [15]. Without loss of generality, we may assume Im$(w)=0$. Set $\alpha=1-w$, then $\alpha$ belongs to $(0, 1)$. We divide the unit disk into $S_1\bigcup S_2\bigcup S_3$, where
Then
On the other hand,
By Lemma 2.1, $K(t)/t^p$ is non-increasing for some $0<p<1$. This gives
Applying Lemma 2.1 again we obtain that $K(t)/t^c$ is non-decreasing for some small enough $c>0$. Note that $c<p$ and $b\geq 2$. Then we have
The above estimates give
Hence (2.1) holds.
Remark 2.4 If $K(t)=t^s, 0<s<1$ and $p\geq 0$, Lemma 2.3 gives the result
This case wsa proved in [18].
Given finitely many complex numbers $w_1, \cdots, w_n$, consider the $2^n$ possible sumes $\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\pm w_j$ obtained as the plus-mius signs vary in the $2^n$ possible ways. For $p>0$, denote by $\mathbb{E}\left(\left|\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\pm w_j\right|^p\right)$ the average value of $\left|\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\pm w_j\right|^p $ over the $2^n$ choices of sign. The following Lemma is called Khinchin's inequality (see [7]).
Lemma 2.5 If $0<q<\infty, $ then
where $C_q$ is a constant that does not depend on $n$.
In this section we will prove Theorem 1.1.
Proof of Theorem 1.1 By Lemma 2.1, we know that $Q_K$ is a subset of $D_p$ for some $0<p<1$. By the reproducing formula of Rochberg and Wu (see [12] or p.75, [18]), we have
We now assume that $\{z_n\}$ is an interpolating sequence for $Q_K\cap H^\infty$. Then for $\epsilon_k^{(j)}=\pm 1, j=1, \cdots, 2^n, k=1, \cdots, n$, there are $f_j\in Q_K\cap H^\infty$ such that $f_j(z_k)=\epsilon_k^{(j)}, k=1, \cdots, n$ and
Replaced $f$ by $f_j\circ\varphi_{a}$ in (3.1) we have
Let $z=\varphi_a(z_k), k=1, 2, \cdots, n$. Then
and we have
We now compute the expectation of both side of the equality. Observe that by (2.2) with $q=1$, we have
There exists a constant C such that
Applying the Cauthy-Schwarz inequality, (2.1), (2.2) with $q=2$ and (3.2) we have
The estimates involving $\mathbb{E}(A)$ and $\mathbb{E}(B)$ indicate that $d\mu=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a $K$-Carleson measure by Corollary 3.1 in [6]. Since $\{z_n\}$ is an interpolating sequence sequence for $H^\infty$, then $\{z_n\}$ is separated.
We need the following result to prove sufficiency, which dues to Earl (see [7]).
Lemma 3.1 Let $\{z_n\}$ be a sequence in the unit disc such that (1.5) holds. Then there is a constant $C$ such that whenever $\{a_n\}\in l^\infty, $ there exists $f\in H^\infty$ such that
and such that
where $B(z)$ is a Blaschke product. The zeros $\xi_n$ of $B(z)$ satisfy $ \left|\varphi_{\xi_n}(z_n)\right|\leq\delta/3 $ and $\{\xi_j\}$ is separated.
For any given $\{a_n\}\in l^\infty$, by Lemma 3.1 there exists a function $f\in H^\infty$ such that (3.3) holds. We now show that $d\mu(z)=\sum\delta_{\xi_n}$ is a $K$-Carleson measure. For any $a\in\mathbb{D}$, by Lemma 1.4 in [7], we have
Note that $K(t)\approx K(2t)$ and $d\mu=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a $K$-Carleson measure. Then we have
This shows that $d\mu(z)=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a $K$-Carleson measure by Corollary 3.1 in [6]. So we have $f\in Q_K$ by Theorem 5.1 in [6]. The proof is completed.
If we choose $K(t)=t^p, 0<p<1$, then the space $Q_K$ is just a $Q_p$ space. Note that the conditions (1.2) and (1.3) hold. This gives the following result which appeared in [10].
Corollary 3.2 The sequence $\{z_n\}$ is an interpolating sequence for $Q_p\bigcap H^\infty$ if and only if $\{z_n\}$ is separted and $d\mu=\sum\delta_{z_n}$ is a $p$-Carleson measure.