Throughout this paper, $S$ always stands for a monoid. A nonempty set $A$ is called a right $S$-act, if there exists a mapping $A\times S\rightarrow A, (a, s)\mapsto as$, satisfying the conditions $(as)t=a(st)$ and $a1=a$, for all $a\in A$ and all $s, t\in S$. Let $S$ be a monoid and $A$ be a right $S$-act. $A$ is called principally weakly flat if the functor $A\otimes-$ preserves embeddings of principal left ideals of $S$ into $S$. In this article, we generalize regular monoids, and define a new class of monoids, which is called $n$-regular monoids. Using a generalization of principal weak flatness, we give some characterizations of these monoids, and some known results are easily obtained.
Definition 1.1 Let $S$ be a monoid and $n$ a positive integer. A right $S$-act $A$ is called principally weakly $n$-flat if for every $s\in S$, $A\otimes Ss^n\rightarrow A\otimes S$ is monic.
Remark 1.2 It is clear that in the above definition, when $n=1$, then a right $S$-act $A$ is principally weakly $n$-flat if and only if $A$ is principally weakly flat. When $n\geq 2$, we will show that there exists a right $S$-act $A$ which is principally weakly $n$-flat but not principally weakly flat.
Suppose $I$ is a proper right ideal of $S$, by [1] the amalgam of two copies of $S$ with the core $I$ is defined as follows. If $x,y$ and $z$ denote elements not belonging to $S$, define $A(I)=(\{x,y\}\times (S-I))\cup (\{z\}\times I),$ and define a right $S$-action on $A(I)$ by
Then $A(I)$ is a right $S$-act.
Lemma 1.3 [3] Let $S$ be a monoid, $a,a^{\prime}\in A_S,b,b^{\prime}\in_{S}\mspace{-6mu}B$. Then $a\otimes b=a^{\prime}\otimes b^{\prime}$ in $A_S\otimes _{S}\!B$ if and only if there exist a positive integer $m$ and elements $a_1,\cdots,a_m\in A_S, b_2,\cdots,b_m\in _{S}\mspace{-6mu}B$, $s_1,t_1,\cdots,s_m,t_m\in S$ such that
Lemma 1.4 Let $S$ be a monoid, $A$ an $S$-act and $n$ a positive integer. The following conditions are equivalent:
(1) $A$ is principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2) For every $s\in S$, any $a,a^{\prime}\in A$, $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A\otimes S$ implies that there exist $m\in N$, elements $a_1,\cdots,a_m\in A_S$, and $s_1,t_1,\cdots,s_m,t_m\in S$ such that
Proof (1)$\Rightarrow$(2) Since $A$ is principally weakly $n$-flat, for every $s\in S$, any $a,a^{\prime}\in A$, $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A\otimes S$ implies that $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A\otimes Ss^n$. By Lemma 1 there exists a positive integer $m$ and elements $a_1,\cdots,a_m\in A_S, q_2,\cdots,q_m\in Ss^n$, $u_1,v_1,\cdots,u_m,v_m\in S$ such that
Since $q_2,q_3,\cdots q_m\in Ss^n$, there exist $c_2,c_3,\cdots,c_m\in S$ such that $q_i=c_is^n(i=2,\cdots,m)$. Hence we have
Denote $u_1=s_1, v_m=t_m, u_ic_i=s_i, v_{i-1}c_i=t_{i-1}, i=2,\cdots,m.$ Then the result follows.
(2)$\Rightarrow$(1) For every $s\in S$, any $a,a^{\prime}\in A$, $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A\otimes S$. By (2) there exist $m\in N$, elements $a_1,\cdots,a_m\in A_S$, and $s_1,t_1,\cdots,s_m,t_m\in S$ such that
Now
in $A\otimes Ss^n$.
A monoid $S$ is called regular, if for every $s\in S$, there exists $x\in S$ such that $s=sxs$. Now we have the following:
Definition 2.1 Let $n$ be a positive integer. A monoid $S$ is called a $n$-regular monoid, if for every $s\in S$, there exists $x\in S$ such that $s^n=s^nxs^n$.
Lemma 2.2 Let $S$ be a monoid, $I$ a proper right ideal of $S$ and $n$ a positive integer. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1) $A(I)$ is principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2) For every $s\in S$, if there exists $r\in S-I$ such that $rs^n\in I$, then there exists $j\in I$ such that $rs^n=js^n$.
Proof (1)$\Rightarrow$(2) Since $A(I)$ is principally weakly $n$-flat, for every $s\in S$, if there exists $r\in S-I$ such that $rs^n\in I$, then $(x,r)\otimes s^n=(y,r)\otimes s^n$ in $A(I)\otimes S$. By Lemma 1.4 there exist $m\in N$, $p_1,\cdots,p_m\in S$, $s_1,t_1,\cdots,s_m,t_m\in S,$ and $w_1,\cdots,w_m\in \{x,y,z\}$ such that
There exists $k\in \{1,\cdots,m-1\}$ such that $w_k\neq w_{k+1}$, and so, there exists $j\in I$ such that $p_kt_k=p_{k+1}s_{k+1}=j$. So we have
(2)$\Rightarrow$(1) Let for every $s\in S$, any $a,a^{\prime}\in A(I)$, $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A(I)\otimes S$. Since $(x,1)S\cong S\cong (y,1)S$(a free hence principally weakly $n$-flat $S$-act), without loss of generality we may restrict ourselves to the case in which $a=(x,r_1), a^{\prime}=(y,r_2), r_1,r_2\in S-I$. Since $(x,r_1)\otimes s^n=(y,r_2)\otimes s^n$, then $r_1s^n=r_2s^n\in I.$ By (2) there exists $j\in I$ such that $r_1s^n=js^n=r_2s^n$. Hence
in $A(I)\otimes Ss^n.$
Corollary 2.3 [3] Let $S$ be a monoid and $I$ be a proper right ideal of $S$. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1) $A(I)$ is principally weakly flat.
(2) For every $i\in I$, there exists $j\in I$ such that $i=ji$.
Proposition 2.4 Let $S$ be a monoid, $I$ a proper right ideal of $S$ and $n$ a positive integer. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1) $S/I$ is principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2) For every $s\in S$, if there exists $r\in S-I$ such that $rs^n\in I$, then there exist $j\in I$ such that $rs^n=js^n$.
Proof (1)$\Rightarrow$(2) Since $S/I$ is principally weakly $n$-flat, for every $s\in S$, if there exists $r\in S-I$ such that $rs^n\in I$, then for every $j^{\prime}\in I$, we have $[r]\otimes s^n=[j^{\prime}]\otimes s^n$ in $S/I\otimes S$. By Lemma 1.4 there exist $m\in N$, $u_1,\cdots,u_m\in S$, and $s_1,t_1,\cdots,s_m,t_m\in S$ such that
Since $j^{\prime}\in I$, we have $u_mt_m\in I$. Let $k$ be the least number such that $k\in \{1,2,\cdots,m\}$ and $u_kt_k\in I$. If $j=u_kt_k$, then $u_{k-1}t_{k-1}\in S-I$. Since $[u_{k-1}]t_{k-1}=[u_k]s_k$, we have $u_{k-1}t_{k-1}=u_ks_k$ and so
(2)$\Rightarrow$(1) For every $s\in S$, any $u,u^{\prime}\in S$, if $[u]\otimes s^n=[u^{\prime}]\otimes s^n$ in $S/I\otimes S$, we have the following four cases to consider:
Case 1 $u,u^{\prime}\in I$. Then it is clear that $[u]\otimes s^n=[u^{\prime}]\otimes s^n$ in $S/I\otimes Ss^n$.
Case 2 $u\in I$. $u^{\prime}\in S-I$. By assumption there exists $j\in I$ such that $u^{\prime}s^n=js^n$. Then
in $S/I\otimes Ss^n$.
Case 3 $u\in S-I$. $u^{\prime}\in I$. It is similar to Case 2.
Case 4 $u,u^{\prime}\in S-I$. By $[u]\otimes s^n=[u^{\prime}]\otimes s^n$ in $S/I\otimes S$, we have $us^n=u^{\prime}s^n$ or $us^n,u^{\prime}s^n\in I$. If $us^n=u^{\prime}s^n$, the result follows. Otherwise by assumption there exists $j_1,j_2\in I$ such that $us^n=j_1s^n$ and $u^{\prime}s^n=j_2s^n$. So
Corollary 2.5 [4] Let $S$ be a monoid and $I$ be a proper right ideal of $S$. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(1) $S/I$ is principally weakly flat.
Theorem 2.6 Let $n$ be a positive integer. The following conditions on a monoid $S$ are equivalent:
(1) All right $S$-acts are principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2) All finitely generated right $S$-acts are principally weakly $n$-flat.
(3) $S$ is a $n$-regular monoid.
Proof (1)$\Rightarrow$(2) is clear.
(2)$\Rightarrow$(3) Let $s\in S$. If $s^nS=S$, it is clear that there exists $x\in S$ such that $s^n=s^nxs^n$. Otherwise $s^nS$ is a proper right ideal of $S$. Denote $I=s^nS$, then $A(I)$ is a finitely generated $S$-act, by assumption $A(I)$ is principally weakly $n$-flat. Since $s^n\in I$ and by Lemma 2.2 there exists $j\in I$ such that $s^n=js^n$. Hence there exists $x\in S$ such that $j=s^nx$, that is $s^n=s^nxs^n$.
(3)$\Rightarrow$(1) Suppose $A$ is a right $S$-act. Since $S$ is $n$-regular, for every $s\in S$, there exists $x\in S$ such that $s^n=s^nxs^n$. For any $a,a^{\prime}\in A$, if $a\otimes s^n=a^{\prime}\otimes s^n$ in $A\otimes S$. Then
in $A\otimes Ss^n.$
Corollary 2.7 [5] The following conditions on a monoid $S$ are equivalent:
(1) All right $S$-acts are principally weakly flat.
(2) All finitely generated right $S$-acts are principally weakly flat.
(3) $S$ is a regular monoid.
Theorem 2.8 Let $n$ be a positive integer. The following conditions on a monoid $S$ are equivalent:
(1) All cyclic right $S$-acts are principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2) All Rees factor right $S$-acts are principally weakly $n$-flat.
(2)$\Rightarrow$(3) By Proposition 2.4, the proof is similar to Theorem 2.6.
(3)$\Rightarrow$(1) By Theorem 2.6, it is clear.